Tustin Estate
Options survey
We worked with residents in 2019 and 2020 to consider options for the future of the estate. In October 2020, there was an options survey where residents ranked the options. For further information on the options, see the options information booklet (PDF, 23.7mb) and the open communities options survey report (PDF, 261kb) and appendix (PDF, 242kb).
Turnout
55% of residents eligible to vote took part. 66% of those who took part were from the low-rise homes and 33% were from the Towers. By tenure, of those who took part:
- 4% were housing applicants
- 9% were resident freeholders
- 9% were resident leaseholders
- 78% were tenants
Overall preferences
- option 1 - 40 votes - 15%
- option 2 - 22 votes - 8%
- option 3 - 33 votes - 2%
- option 4 - 131 votes - 49%
- option 5 - 39 votes - 15%
As we asked residents to rank the options to find out which option had a majority, redistributing the second preference of those who voted for option 2, the result was:
- option 1 - 52 votes - 20%
- option 3 - 39 votes - 15%
- option 4 - 131 votes - 50%
- option 5 - 39 votes -15%
Redistributing the second preference of those who voted for option 3, the result was:
- option 1 - 61 votes - 24%
- option 4 - 145 votes - 57%
- option 5 - 48 votes - 19%
The favoured option is, therefore, option 4 - to demolish and rebuild the low-rise homes on the Tustin Estate.
|
Tenure |
Option 1 |
Option 2 |
Option 3 |
Option 4 |
Option 5 |
Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Council tenant |
26 votes 13% |
21 votes 10% |
27 votes 13% |
113 votes 54% |
21 votes 10% |
208 votes |
|
Housing applicant |
1 vote 10% |
0 votes 0% |
1 vote 10% |
7 votes 70% |
1 vote 10% |
10 votes |
|
Resident freeholder |
7 votes 29% |
0 votes 0% |
3 votes 13% |
3 votes 13% |
11 votes 46% |
24 votes |
|
Resident leaseholder |
6 votes 26% |
1 vote 4% |
2 votes 9% |
8 votes 35% |
6 votes 26% |
23 votes |
|
Block |
Option 1 |
Option 2 |
Option 3 |
Option 4 |
Option 5 |
Turnout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Ambleside Point |
4 votes 10% |
6 votes 15% |
2 votes 5% |
25 votes 63% |
3 votes 8% |
40 votes 48% |
|
Bowness House |
0 votes 0% |
0 votes 0% |
4 votes 17% |
12 votes 50% |
8 votes 33% |
24 votes 71% |
|
Grasmere Point |
2 votes 9% |
0 votes 0% |
1 vote 5% |
18 votes 82% |
1 vote 5% |
22 votes 31% |
|
Heversham House |
8 votes 12% |
3 votes 5% |
10 votes 15% |
37 votes 57% |
7 votes 11% |
65 votes 63% |
|
Hillbeck Close |
1 vote 5% |
2 votes 10% |
4 votes 20% |
11 votes 55% |
2 votes 10% |
20 votes 69% |
|
Kentmere house |
5 votes 20% |
5 votes 20% |
4 votes 16% |
9 votes 36% |
2 votes 8% |
25 votes 74% |
|
Manor Grove |
14 votes 33% |
3 votes 7% |
4 votes 10% |
8 votes 19% |
13 votes 31% |
42 votes 71% |
|
Windermere Point |
6 votes 22% |
3 votes 11% |
4 votes 15% |
11 votes 41% |
3 votes 11% |
27 votes 38% |
The results show that the favoured option for all of the blocks on the estate with the exception of Manor Grove was option 4.
Page last updated: 29 July 2024
